|
|
 |
 | View Topic |  |
|  |
|
| |
| |
|
  Walinonu | |
Go-Kart Racer
|
Hey guys,
I was just looking at some WRs on Nadeo tracks and I noticed some of them incorrectly had the rating 'uncompetitive':
"A-2"
"A-4"
"A-6"
"A-8"
"B-4"
"C-7"
and, as of today,
"A-9"
I think it would be nice and fair if someone who can would change 'em to the normal Nadeo rating 
Edit: Oh, and while we're at it, "D-6" should be uncompetitive. |
| Last edited 24-Sep-2010 by Walinonu |
|
|
| Rose Tattoo | |
®
|
its just your opinion 
maps where the top 10 rec is within 1 or 2 seconds cant be a competition track for rating,
a simple map where you will find some "differences" between the recs, that what we call competive!
RT |
|
|
| Walinonu | |
Go-Kart Racer
|
Hmm?!
I always thought the maps I mentioned were 'uncompetitive' because back in the day, everyone thought the best possible time had been reached (like on A-0, A-1, etc). I don't think you can just say "maps where the top 10 rec is within 1 or 2 seconds cant be a competition track for rating", it takes some serious skills to get the WR on such a track! Also, if that is what makes a track uncompetitive, why aren't tracks like B-0 and B-2 uncompetitive, hmm?!
Would like to hear other people's opinion on this. |
| Last edited 24-Sep-2010 by Walinonu |
|
|
| Rose Tattoo | |
®
|
the top 10 difference of B-0 and B-2 are more than 0.01 sec
so I told you something wrong, I ment tracks which have just a top 10 difference of 0,01 secs cant be competive |
|
|
| Fusion.Shanki | |
Aye Aye Captain!
Moderator
|
i think too close wr's aren't competetive.
imo it's good how it is atm! |
|
|
| Dimidrol | |
Go-Kart Racer
|
the other problem i have with uncompetitive nadeos is that they are not shown in the "most-recently-set nadeo records" list
i would like to see all of them. |
|
|
| |
 | |  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|